Psychopathy and Attachment: The Neuroscience of Emotional Object Permanence, or Lack Thereof

404: feelings not found.

I don’t think about you when you’re gone. This isn’t because I don’t care. It is because my brain is not wired in a way that makes this automatic.

I was about 10 years old when I realized that I didn’t mean it when I said that I missed anyone. My mom and dad separated when I was very young, which meant I spent my childhood summers and Christmas with my mom. The rest of the year, my relationship with my mom was over the phone. She would always tell me how much she loved me and missed me, every single call without fail. I would always say it back, of course. It didn’t occur to me that I didn’t really know what missing someone felt like until one summer when she asked me if I missed my dad, and I told her of course. But I thought about it and realized that I wasn’t actually sure. More than anything, I missed the rain-style shower-head in the upstairs bathroom at my dad’s house. But, missing my dad? Why would I? I will be back there at the end of summer.

I am going to go ahead and assume that you are familiar with the concept of object permanence, otherwise you wouldn’t be reading this article. The best way to describe why I don’t think about those close to me, don’t miss them when they aren’t with me, is that I lack emotional object permanence. While I have maybe 5% of the emotional experience you do, that only applies to the moments we actively share. I don’t meaningfully think about you when you aren’t around and I certainly don’t feel anything if you do happen to cross my mind. You simply fade out of my awareness and heart.

Why? Turns out my default mode network (DMN) has a different default and slightly different network. When a neurotypical brain idles, the DMN kicks in and plays a sort of social screensaver. Partners are missed, conversations are replayed, feelings like worries and excitement about relationships are experienced. The DMN creates what I imagine to be a kind of emotional hologram of people who aren’t present. If this sounds like “no doy” to you, congrats you are probably not a psychopath. The default mode network is named as such because it’s exactly that, the default. And for most, the default is thinking about other people. This is part of the glue that causes society to stick together.

I know this might sound somewhat poetic, and it is, but it’s also genuinely measurable. The DMN is one of the most robustly studied networks in neuroscience, first identified over two decades ago and since validated across thousands of fMRI studies. Married couples scanned show synchronized DMN activity, and the degree of synchronization directly predicts relationship satisfaction. When people think about close others during brain scans, the same regions light up reliably and predictably. This is textbook neuroscience, not some woo-woo fringe theory.

The DMN, primarily the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, and angular gyrus, activates during rest and is directly involved in thinking about others, thinking about yourself, remembering the past, and imagining the future. The mPFC specifically handles representations of people close to you, storing emotionally tagged models of your partner, your friends, family, the people who matter. The amygdala provides the emotional charge that makes those representations feel important, and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) integrates that charge into your resting awareness. That’s why neurotypicals miss someone without trying. The DMN is running a simulation of that person, tagged with emotional weight by the amygdala, surfaced by the mPFC, and it happens automatically whenever the brain has a free moment.

In Factor 1 Psychopathy, the amygdala-vmPFC connection is muted. The emotional tagging system that would code other people as high-priority during idle processing doesn’t fire at the same intensity. Research using fMRI found that the posteromedial cortex, a core DMN region, shows atypical deactivation patterns in psychopathy. This difference was specifically associated with Factor 1 affective-interpersonal traits, not Factor 2 antisocial traits. (For more on Factor 1 vs Factor 2 check out I am a prosocial psychopath. And no, that isn’t the oxymoron you think it is.) The salience network, the brain’s switching mechanism that decides what’s important enough to interrupt current processing, doesn’t toggle for the same reasons. Emotional cues from other people don’t carry enough voltage to trigger the interrupt. Emotional information arrives at the prefrontal cortex as simple data rather than urgent signal. Ex: We both see a ball flying at someone. Your brain flags the danger and might compel you to tell the person to watch out, whereas my brain admires the trajectory.

When a primary psychopath’s brain idles, it’s not populating the empty space with other people’s faces and feelings. It’s resting, or maybe processing self-referential goals. Research suggests the posteromedial cortex, the region most associated with Factor 1 traits, may actually be doing compensatory work during idle moments, processing self-referential information in a loop that a neurotypical brain would normally split between self and others. One interpretation from the research is simply greater self-focus, but not in a narcissistic way. More like a radio that only really picks up one station: SELF FM. The signal for others just isn't strong enough to come through, so the dial stays where it is. On myself. Not because I chose that station. Because it's the only one my antenna receives clearly. You wouldn’t choose to try to listen to a station you can’t clearly pick up, even if it were playing your favorite song.

The point is that for primary psychopaths the social screensaver just isn’t running. No DVD menu screensaver logo bouncing around representing my family, friends, partners. The mPFC does still store representations of people. It just can’t tag them with the emotional charge that would make them surface automatically during rest. While my lazy-ass amygdala still processes emotional stimuli, its output just doesn’t reach the threshold that would make other people’s distress or absence feel urgent. Remember, I feel about 5% of what you do. So it probably takes something hitting damn near 100% of that 5% for my brain to momentarily flag it as worth paying attention to.

All that said, I wouldn’t agree that my network is failing to do its job. Its job is just different due to my network’s configuration. And that configuration difference cascades into everything. The not missing people, that’s my amygdala not tagging their absence as emotionally important. The emotional object permanence, that’s the DMN not maintaining a felt simulation of a loved one who’s left the room. Neurotypical brains are filled with others in every idle moment, every gap, every quiet second. When my mind has a free moment, it simply doesn’t fill it with other people like yours does.

So, what do I say when partners tell me they miss me? I tell them I miss them too, of course. It costs me nothing to say it back, and it means so much to them. Is this manipulation? Well, faithful reader, riddle me this: is a lover’s description of a sunset any less beautiful to the colorblind? Is it manipulative to hear details of cascading streaks of sherbet orange interspersed with withering lilac and cotton candy pink, and to respond “I wish I was there with you, that sounds absolutely beautiful.”

---